Attorney General
#1-Lujan:
Positives: some name ID, Hispanic-ish, Establishment support (look at the endorsements), and a fundraising network.
Negatives: minority whip w/ little to show for it, mediocre public speaking skills, "i didn't know he was a lawyer," doesn't exude strength and confidence
Overall: Cash is king, he might scare Rotellini out of the race after this quarter’s numbers come out.
#2 Rotallini
Positives: "Smart, articulate & clean," not a partisan hack, she's a woman (harder to pick on w/out looking like an asshole), short in stature but comes across tough.
Negatives: little name ID, funny name (sounds like a pasta, makes me hungry), she's not married (what's up with that), was not previously politically active, AND can she raise money?
Overall: It would be great news for her if Rabago stayed out of the race. Unless she can raise money (lots of money) she's gonna need Lujan to run a terrible campaign.
#3 Rabago
Positves: very well liked amongst activist, nice guy w/ a cute family, recently in the headlines for work w/ AG's office, has been at every Democractic event for the past year.
Negatives: waited way to long to jump in, has a family w/ young kids (does he have the time to run), can he win a statewide race, and most impotantly what's up with that goatee/beard (this makes me question his judgment--if he's going to run why hasn't he shaved it off!).
Overall: He's the lead prosecutor against Quik Cash but he needs to resign very very very soon, so he won't be able to say "I took down Quik Cash" the way Rotellini can say "I took down the Baptist Foundation ponzi scheme."
Superintendent of Public Instruction
#1 Kotterman:
Positive: Former educator, great teacher network, nice lady, supports keeping the AIMS.
Negatives: Former "union" boss, lacks the polish (off-cuff joke regarding special needs kids at the MCDP meeting wasn't funny), supports keeping the AIMS
Overall: She could have potential but the union this will be big in the general and she supports keeping AIMS (what was the AEA's position at the time AIMS was being debated?--to lazy to look)
#2 Williams:
Positives: Teach for America (Arizona ED), great network, experienced campaigner, decent campaign organization, has his shit together.
Negatives: He's so 2006, '06 theme reinforced by his web 1.0 website, Republicans may use his private life against him, can he raise money?
Overall: He's an effective speaker (people thought he had the edge in last weeks debate down in Baja Arizona) and knows what he's talkng about but again, is he an old-hat?
Secretary of State
#1 Wercinski:
Positves: veteran (has picture w/ Ronald Reagan), has been actively campaigning for months (maybe even years!), great network of supporters and friends, did well during his time at Commissioner.
Negatives: Awkward speech at MCDP meeting (sorry, it just was), does he really stand a chance against Bennet?,
Overall: It's his to lose.
#2 Deschene:
Positives: veteran (special forces), intellectual and thoughtful, has a JD and a master in engineering, Native roots could boost turnout on Rez, cute family.
Negatives: a little late, sinlge term in state house, may come across as overly ambitious, people think he's rushing things (people thought he could run for a US congressional seat)
Overall: He should wait
TreaurerAndrei Cherney: Nice guy, policy wonk with a nice resume, he's an author. He seems to think being Treasurer will somehow effect state policy. Maybe some time in the state legistlature would have helped.
GovernorTerry Goddard: Still exploring. It looks like 2010 could be Terry's year.